|
SubscriptionsSites I Read
|
|
|
|
| 報復女兒被姦
繼父雞姦青年
14/01/2008
【美聯社】美國一名十八歲青年涉嫌雞姦繼父的八歲親生女，繼父為報復，將他帶到一間廢屋，用「金屬工具」以其人之道還治其人之身。兩父子面臨法律制裁。
德州沃思堡市警方向當地報章透露，「這是很特別的一個案件，但我們有公正的司法去制裁罪犯，不容任何人以報復手段了結私仇。」為保護女孩身份免於曝光，當局沒有公開繼父與青年的姓名。
面臨嚴重性侵犯起訴
案中繼父年齡為三十二歲，警方指他當場逮到繼子性侵犯其女兒，醫院的驗身報告亦顯示女孩曾被人雞姦。青年在二日被捕，被控嚴重性侵犯罪，繼父曾警告妻子別保釋他，不過妻子並沒依從丈夫的說話。
青年翌日獲釋後致電回家，但電話由繼父接聽，他將青年接走並帶到一間廢屋，然後用棒球棍毆打他，並以金屬工具將其雞姦。青年致電報警求助，警方將繼父拘捕，他亦面臨嚴重性侵犯的起訴。
The best example of tit for tat
| | |
| 第十七屆華山論劍正式揭幕﹐八大門派總共派出兩百弟子爭奪天下第一之寶座與及保管九陰真經同葵花寶典之權力。今年後起之秀多不勝數﹐分組形勢撲朔迷離﹐後
市前景極不明朗。想在股市中出奇制勝穩坐釣魚船﹐以下幾隻股份最有機會跑贏大市﹐排名不分先後﹕鑲白﹑君曜﹑智毅﹑梓晴。其他股份數據不足難以作出評價。
以下賽事大部份都兩隊都唔知係咩人打﹐所以賠率絕對欠奉﹐等OCDA upload 左 team list 之後再作評論。
27th Oct 2007 (Sat) 10:30am
約克大學天權隊(單) vs麥瑪斯達大學君銳隊(雙)
貿易不平等是引發第一次鴉片戰爭的主因
西安大學浩鋐隊(雙) vs滑鐵盧大學懿恆隊(單)
事實勝於雄辯
懷雅遜大學梓晴隊(反) vs滑鐵盧大學雋恆隊(正)
基因改造食物對人類生活利多於弊
27th Oct 2007 (Sat) 1:30pm
西安大學浩銳隊(單) vs滑鐵盧大學智毅隊(雙)
政府不應將宗教聖地商業化
多倫多大學鑲黃隊(反) vs約克大學玉衡隊(正)
合作比競爭更能促進太空科技發展
28th Oct 2007 (Sun) 10:30am
約克大學天樞隊(正) vs皇后大學翱翔隊(反)
鋒芒畢露者更易成功
滑鐵盧大學睿恆隊(雙) vs偉佛羅利亞大學軒菱隊(單)
“先讓一部份人富起來” 的思想對中國發展利多於弊
28th Oct 2007 (Sun) 1:30pm
麥瑪斯達大學君薈隊(正) vs 西安大學浩鏘隊(反)
文物應被送回發源地
懷雅遜大學梓晞隊(反) vs多倫多大學正黃隊(正)
電子科技對演藝界發展弊多於利
多倫多大學鑲白隊(正) vs 西安大學浩鋒隊(反)
仁者無敵
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
禮拜六晚先俾蝦頭介親﹐之後禮拜日俾鎖匙刮甩皮血流如注﹐今日就飲大吉利是茶淥親甩皮...唔知講咩好。
| | |
| 回顧以前寫下來的 xanga﹐最近發表的﹐都是無無聊聊的轉貼﹔或是做文抄公﹐把別人的評論轉過來。
很少把最近發生的事﹐或把對某些事的感受﹐在xanga 上公開。
每天身邊發生的事不少﹐今天和誰上課﹐做了小測﹐和誰一齊學社交舞﹔昨天得悉誰跟誰走在一起﹐誰跟誰反目成仇﹔前天誰打碎誰的幻想﹐誰跟誰分手各走各路...每天新鮮熱辣。但打中文也好﹐英文也好﹐值得花時間寫下來的很少。
感覺更不想寫﹐自從因為在xanga 發表對工作的不滿而被解僱後﹐寫甚麼也要三思而行。就算自身對某些事的觀感﹐發表前也要想想會否得罪人﹐或令別人也因為我自己的事而不開心﹐躊躇再三﹐覺得不寫比較好。加上不習慣公開自己的想法和情感﹐還是把這些留給自己比較好。
長江後浪推前浪﹐一代新人葬舊人。覺得看xanga 的人越來越少﹐花時間在Facebook 的人以幾何級數上昇。如MSN 取代ICQ﹐xanga 也許﹐已經日暮西山。
早已習慣了﹐戴著面具做人
推杯換盞﹐口中只道天涼好個秋
熱鬧繁華過後﹐又有多少淒悽慘慘戚戚﹖
活在當下﹐只能儘量自得其樂﹐享受當下 | | |
| 25 Year-Old Beauty Seeks Rich Banker
The following exchange took place on Craigslist - the investment banker's response is a classic!
What am I doing wrong?
Okay, I’m tired of beating around the bush. I’m a beautiful
(spectacularly beautiful) 25 year old girl. I’m articulate and classy.
I’m not from New York. I’m looking to get married to a guy who makes at
least half a million a year. I know how that sounds, but keep in mind
that a million a year is middle class in New York City, so I don’t
think I’m overreaching at all.
Are there any guys who make 500K or more on this board ? Any wives ?
Could you send me some tips ? I dated a business man who made an
average of around 200 - 250K. But that’s where I seem to hit a
roadblock. $250,000 won’t get me to Central Park West. I know a woman
in my yoga class who was married to an investment banker, and lives in
Tribeca. She’s not as pretty as I am, nor is she a great genius. So
what is she doing right ? How do I get to her level ?
Here are my questions specifically:
- Where do you single rich men hang out ? Give me specifics - bars, restaurants, gyms
- What are you looking for in a mate? Be honest guys, you won’t hurt my feelings
- Is there an age range I should be targeting ?
- Why are some of the women living lavish lifestyles on the Upper East
Side so plain? I’ve seen really ‘Plain Jane’ boring types, who have
nothing to offer incredibly wealthy guys. Then I’ve seen drop dead
gorgeous girls in singles bars in the East Village. What’s the story
there ?
- Lawyers, investment bankers, doctors. How much do those guys really make ? And where do the hedge fund guys hang out ?
- How do you rich guys decide on marriage vs. just a girlfriend ? I am looking for MARRIAGE ONLY.
Please hold your insults - I’m putting myself out there in an honest
way. Most beautiful women are superficial - at least I’m being up front
about it. I wouldn’t be searching for these kind of guys if I wasn’t
able to match them - in looks, culture, sophistication, and keeping a
nice hearth and home'.
An Investment Banker's Response:
Dear Pers-431649184:
'I read your posting with great interest and have thought meaningfully
about your dilemma. I offer the following analysis of your predicament.
Firstly, I’m not wasting your time. I qualify as a guy who fits your
bill - that is, I make more than $500K per year. That said, here’s how
I see it:
Your offer, from the prospective of a guy like me, is a plain and
simple crappy business deal. Here’s why. Cutting through all the B.S.,
what you suggest is a simple trade: you bring your looks to the party
and I bring my money. Fine, simple. But here’s the rub, your looks will
fade and my money will likely continue into perpetuity - in fact, it is
very likely that my income will increase, but it is an absolute certainty that you won’t be getting any more beautiful!
So, in economic terms, you are a depreciating asset. Not only are you a
depreciating asset, however, your depreciation accelerates! Let me
explain - you’re 25 now and will likely remain pretty hot for the next
5 years, but less so each year. Then the fade begins in earnest. By 35
- stick a fork in you!
So, in Wall Street terms, we'd call you a trading position - not a buy
and hold…hence the rub…marriage. It doesn’t make good business sense to
'buy you' (which is what you’re asking) - so I’d rather lease. In case
you think I’m being cruel, I would say the following: if my money were
to go away, so would you - so when your beauty fades I need an out too.
It’s as simple as that. So the deal that makes sense for me is dating,
not marriage.
Separately, I was taught early in my career about efficient markets.
So, I wonder why a girl as 'articulate, classy and spectacularly
beautiful' as you has been unable to find your sugar daddy. I find it
hard to believe that, if you are as gorgeous as you say you are, your
$500K man hasn’t found you - if only for a tryout.
By the way, you could always find a way to make your own money - and then we wouldn’t need to have this difficult conversation.
With all that said, I must say you’re going about it the right way.
Classic 'pump and dump'. I hope this is helpful, and if you want to
enter into some sort of lease, please let me know'.
Reader Comment:
1. If she piles on the weight, it's likely to be 'plump and dump!'
2. 'The Investment Banker's response is correct if you see the gold
digger as providing only companionship, looks and sophistication.
However, some Investment Bankers may wish to have offspring carrying
their genes into the next generation. This is a long-term contract, and
you have to 'buy and hold' rather than 'lease'. Therefore this 25
year-old beauty should change her sales pitch to: 'I'll give you nice
children AND I'll let you do whatever else you want on the side as long
as you're discreet'.
3. 'I hate to say it but, in the current environment, this Master of
the Universe should ship her in asap. Then at least he'll have a nice
shoulder to cry on when he gets canned. We're ALL depreciating assets
these days. At least this young lady has some gumption as well as those
spectacular good looks and style to fall back on'.
4. Response to investment banker:
'Ah! But I am an depreciating asset all right (for that matter, you are
too - but your cash flow stream more than overcompensates for the
toxicity of the future tummy expansion, and contraction of the hair).
But the depreciating asset is a convertible one with two embedded
options:
The first option is for conversion to a wife, preferably before the day
that the hair / tummy factor becomes less than positive and cashflow
benefits become more important. If you do not take up that
wife-conversion option, then the expanding gut and thinning hair will
require a constantly and exponentially increasing stream of invested
earnings to attract young chicks.
The second option is that you have a put option on a baby (which is
preferably contingent on the first option being exercised), safe in the
knowledge that good genes will be passed on. You have to admit, the
main reason why you investment bankers are so attractive is because you
can make money. However, we have established information that those
money-making genes do not travel very well. My good looks will probably
be passed on though.
So, for an upfront investment in this depreciating asset will, in the long run, make your overall yield curve positive.
(Source - The Daily Salty)
Rob Campbell
J.P.Morgan
Diversified Industrials Investment Banking
277 Park Avenue , 16/F, New York, NY 10172 | | |
|
